A question from a Washington Post/ABC Opinion Poll in USA
There has been news lately about plans for a Muslim community center and place of worship in Lower Manhattan, near the site of the former World Trade Center. Do you yourself think this Muslim community center should or should not be built at this location? Do you feel that way strongly or somewhat?
--------- Should -------- ------ Should not -------
NET Strongly Somewhat NET Somewhat Strongly
29% 14 15 66% 13 53
As per the answer to the above opinion poll question a large majority of US citizens think that there should not be Muslim center of worship in Lower Manhattan in New York.
Very strange indeed to see such intolerance from the citizens of a Nation which swears by the Bill of Rights in their Constitution which allows freedom of practice of all religions
THE “ground zero mosque,” is not at ground zero. It’s not a mosque but an Islamic cultural center containing a prayer room.
There are many mosques and Muslim prayer rooms in Lower Manhattan. Now will they want to ban all such places?
Fortunately many sane voices of US citizens could be heard clearly above the din caused by hate-mongers.
"It is my hope that this will help to bring our city even closer together, and help repudiate the false and repugnant idea that the attacks of 9/11 were in any way consistent with Islam," said Bloomberg. "Muslims are as much a part of our city and our country as the people of any faith - and they are as welcome to worship in lower Manhattan as any other group
New York City Mayor Bloomberg
There has been a mosque on Warren St., a stone's throw from Ground Zero, since 1970, the year the World Trade Center opened. It draws 1,000 worshipers each Friday, according to the group's website, masjidmanhattan.com.Do today's complainers now want to expel Masjid Manhattan?
For that matter, I wonder why they haven't said a word about New York Dolls, a strip club that's as close to Ground Zero as the proposed Park51 center.
The nightly boozing and lap dances do not seem to have disturbed the sensibilities of those now earnestly defending the sacred ground near the World Trade Center site.
For that matter, I wonder why they haven't objected to the space inside the Pentagon where Muslim prayer, holiday celebrations and readings of the Koran have gone on for nearly a decade.
Errol Louis in NY Daily News
The ginned-up rage over the “ground zero mosque” was not motivated by a serious desire to protect America from the real threat of terrorists lurking at home and abroad — a threat this furor has in all likelihood exacerbated — but by the potential short-term rewards of winning votes by pandering to fear during an election season. Their sudden concern for ground zero is suspect to those of us who actually live in New York. All but 12 Republicans in the House voted against health benefits for 9/11 responders just last month.
Frank Rich in NewYork Times
Most important support for the proposed Islamic cultural center came from Donna Marsh O'Connor
National Spokesperson, September 11th Families for Peaceful Tomorrows
She wrote in Huffington Post
On Wednesday, the 25th of August I spoke at a press conference organized by a group called New York Neighbors for American Values in favor of the building of an Islamic Cultural Center two blocks away and around the corner from, as it has come to be called, Ground Zero. Ground Zero. Ground Zero. No matter how many times I say it, it doesn't lose meaning. Instead, it accrues meaning. It is the place where my pregnant daughter Vanessa Lang Langer was murdered.
However, as we approach the 9th anniversary of the day I and the thousands of others who lost loved ones to a gang of mass murders will not be able to simply mourn the loss of our children, parents, cousins and siblings. Because until something in our public imagination displaces it, 9/11 will be a political football in the debate over the Islamic Center. Central to this debate, it seems, is the question of what constitutes "sensitivity" to 9/11 families
And, in a heated elections season, some elected officials and candidates have seized an opportunity to play on our collective fears in order to use 9/11/2001 for political gain. In nine years this has been the habit of our so-called leaders.
To them I ask this: what about the sensitivities of families like mine and hundreds of others who join me in supporting the Islamic Center? Are our loved ones somehow less worthy than those of family members who oppose its construction?
I am sensitive to what I believe is a threat to religious freedom, to the First Amendment, to our hallowed Constitution. I am sensitive to the notion that, in the name of my daughter, an entire religion is being demonized for the acts of a group of heinous criminals.
Today, at the end of summer, when much of the thickness of the collective air loses its oppressive moisture, when the sun is still bright in the late summer sky, and the air is crisp though still warm, our televisions, our elected officials and candidates for office cannot fail but to remind us of the towers falling in endless clouds of grey matter. They exploit mercilessly our emotions. They use and have used these images to amplify the fears we feel, not of the criminal acts, but of Muslim people.
Here then is my message: if you really care about 9/11 families and their collective sensitivities please leave us to our memories and our pain and stop fanning the flames of hatred and intolerance - to me that would be an act of supreme sensitivity
Let us hope that such words of maturity and compassion will always prevail in this World.
What I like about the US is that even if 90% of people don't want a Mosque in the WTC surroundings, no one can stop it.
ReplyDeleteThe law is the law and if it's legal for a mosque to come up there then that's the end of the story.
What I like about the US is that even if 90% of people don't want a Mosque in the WTC surroundings, no one can stop it.
ReplyDeleteThe law is the law and if it's legal for a mosque to come up there then that's the end of the story.
whose idea was it to have a mosque in that sensitive area in the first place? why start a controversy at all? the one way out now is to have a place each for all religions - or have none at all.
ReplyDeletepersonally, i feel the place should be kept absolutely secular.
have you come acros a comprehensive site which gives the entire history of the idea of a mosque at ground 0?
BJP, Yes USA is much more law abiding than most Asian countries Still in an election year this can cause enough hate, polarisation & political pressure big enough to make the proponents of cultural center retract the decision
ReplyDeleteKPJ, Disappointed with ur comment. How many blocks around Ground Zero you consider out of bounds for Islamic Institutions? What abt the mosque already there?Do you have the same opinion for Islamist terror sites of India too like CST in Mumbai ?Will your sensitivity be hurt if you see a Muslim praying in CST ?
ReplyDelete"There are many mosques and Muslim prayer rooms in Lower Manhattan.There has been a mosque on Warren St., a stone's throw from Ground Zero, since 1970, the year the World Trade Center opened. It draws 1,000 worshipers each Friday"
ReplyDeleteYou said it.What is the purpose of another one at the site itself?If it is prayer,can be done at the 'stones throw distance'. What difference does it make?
Tolerance is not meant for one sect.Do you want to remind the Gods of what we have done?. Sorry.
Dr Antony, 1 The proposed building is not a mere mosque but a cultural center aimed at decreasing the distance and misundertandings between Islam and the West.It also contains a prayer hall That's all. Tolerance should be there in every religion/society.By showing intolerance those who oppose the Islamic center is trying to emulate the intolerance of feudal monarchies of the Gulf. That is a sad backward step.
ReplyDelete